Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
147-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

147-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003631 50.852333)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003546 50.852324,-1.003550 50.852340,-1.003562 50.852356,-1.003580 50.852368,-1.003604 50.852376,-1.003630 50.852378,-1.003657 50.852376,-1.003680 50.852369,-1.003700 50.852357,-1.003712 50.852342,-1.003716 50.852325,-1.003713 50.852309,-1.003701 50.852293,-1.003682 50.852281,-1.003659 50.852273,-1.003632 50.852271,-1.003606 50.852273,-1.003582 50.852280,-1.003563 50.852292,-1.003551 50.852307,-1.003546 50.852324)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL